"Day Million" by Frederick Pohl was probably the most satisfying read in general for me in a while. Obviously what a lot of popular science fiction stories do is start a story and you have to figure your way around the story. This happened to me in this story as you can imagine. Like last weeks story, this takes place in the future. I do like that as I go along in the story, it explains more and more without revealing too much. It's great. Right away I see the message this story is trying to bring across. Love in this case has no race, religion, and certainly not a gender. I assume that this short love story is between a girl and a boy but I realize quickly that it isn't. To have this story written in 1966 where being "different" was an extreme taboo, this was very edgy of Pohl to write. I enjoy that he is challenging the small and narrow way we (used to) think. It is writing like tghis that provokes and challeneges boundaries created by society. I also think his use of language was very keen in this story. This wouldn't be cosidered a conventional love story soley based on the fact that it keeps you guessing on who is who. Usually we get the girl and the boy but like I said before it keeps you guessing. For this to be written at this time, to me, is sort of revolutionary because it was the 1960's. Things that where different or out of the "norm" we kept on the down low. To see him deter from the usual love story path is shocking, but the good kind of shocking.
"When It Changed" by Joanna Russ was yet another interesting read. Although it has lost me in some places, I enjoyed it! Once idea that really struck me, was the fact that when men arrived on Whileaway I noticed right away how they realized that this particular planet has not had any type of man on it for 30 generation so they go into this caveman like mentality of thinking that women on this planet must be yearning for men! But in reality they weren't and were doing just finewithout them. This story was written in 1972, which to me is a year full of the braking of all types of barriers. Since this planet (Whileaway) has figured out a way to reproduce without men I truly don't think they serve any type of purpose there. Maybe some women on that planet like men? but I highly doubt it, since it has been 30 generations without men. This planet has thrived without men and will continue to thrive without men.
Thursday, February 26, 2015
Friday, February 20, 2015
Blog Set #7
I can easily say that the short story "We Can Remember It For You Wholesale" by Philip K. Dick was an awesome read. The idea that this man was imagining this type of furture to me is complelty amazing. I don't really think that the idea of artificially transplanted memories will be invented anytime time soon but then again, who really knows? If we were to easily implant memories into us as easy as getting cosmetic surgery, i think we would lose our humanistic element. I feel as if we won't be human anymore because you have artificial memory in you, which makes us sound a little bit like robots. I don't like the idea of having a memory implanted in me, even though I will be extremely convinced it has happend, a part of me deep, deep down in my brain will know it is false. We will all be living a lie.
I'm sort of torn with the whole casting thing. I do like that Arnold Schwarzenegger was cast because he sort of embodied a "hero" type physique but I also do wish they cast some one with an under-dog element. I could really have seen Matthew Broderick play this role because physique wise he isn't very big but I feel like that would've added a sense of vulnurability and under-dogness (I know that isn't a word) because he is somewhat small but yet he is tackling this huge feat of saving the universe. I think that would've been cool to see someone of average size to save the whole world; more men probably could have related if Matthew Broderick was cast. Remember this is all opinion based! hahaha
I think maybe movies being based off of movies impacts the story in every sense. Maybe some people haven't read the story and go see the movie and then read the story; but they already have a sense of what is going to happen since they saw the movie already and don't have the space to imagine it in their heads as they read. To me that takes away the whole purpose of reading. I love reading because you see it in your head and it exercises your imagination. Movie adaptations of stories in a way destroy that.
I'm sort of torn with the whole casting thing. I do like that Arnold Schwarzenegger was cast because he sort of embodied a "hero" type physique but I also do wish they cast some one with an under-dog element. I could really have seen Matthew Broderick play this role because physique wise he isn't very big but I feel like that would've added a sense of vulnurability and under-dogness (I know that isn't a word) because he is somewhat small but yet he is tackling this huge feat of saving the universe. I think that would've been cool to see someone of average size to save the whole world; more men probably could have related if Matthew Broderick was cast. Remember this is all opinion based! hahaha
I think maybe movies being based off of movies impacts the story in every sense. Maybe some people haven't read the story and go see the movie and then read the story; but they already have a sense of what is going to happen since they saw the movie already and don't have the space to imagine it in their heads as they read. To me that takes away the whole purpose of reading. I love reading because you see it in your head and it exercises your imagination. Movie adaptations of stories in a way destroy that.
Tuesday, February 10, 2015
Blog Set #6
"Burning Chrome" by William Gibson was extremely
fascinating to me in more ways than one. There is a lot of cyber elements that come
into play in the story. Another thing that got me interested was the fact that
it also has traces of romance in it as well with Bobby and Rikki. When I was
finished with the story, the vibe I got from Bobby and Jack were positive. Jack
was the sensible one and Bobby was the brasher and wild one, and I think they
complement each other very well. To me they seemed to do no harm, even though
they were hackers and in this world we associate hacking with harm and theft,
Bobby and Jack were not (to me) malicious and out to steal every ones bank
account, but instead stealing money from Chrome; who is the true bad person
here. I also got a sense of betrayal from Rikki to both Bobby and Jack but
Bobby took it a little harsher. Rikki turned out to be a double crosser;
working for a program with ties to Chrome but at the same time pretending to be
with Bobby and Jack. This is a huge let down for Bobby who was growing fond of
her at a rapid rate. Rikki uses the money she (technically Bobby and Jack)
stole to but herself “eyes"? I am not quite sure what the connection is
between her and the "eyes" she purchased. But I feel the world Gibson
is trying to foresee is a vain one, a world where people will do anything; even
if it means compromising your morale to look picture perfect. All in all the
ending is sad because Rikki and Bobby don't come together and she stole from
them (the good guys) which doesn't always leave a good taste in your
mouth.
"Computer Friendly" by
Eileen Gunn was very enjoyable because it told the story from a perspective
completely different; a seven-year-old girl. I think she chose to write using
this angle was because this was a new setting we (the reader) are learning
about. Instead of using an adult and having the adult just throw you into the
scenario, little kids her age are very well known to ask many questions so I
think Eileen uses a seven-year-olds point of view to purposefully make you ask
those questions then and there compared to what seems to be the usual; you
start reading a science fiction short story/novel and you are lost in the
beginning of it until I continue reading then i understand what’s happening
hahah (I think this happens to just me though)
Wednesday, February 4, 2015
Blog Set #5 Artificial and Posthuman Life
As I was reading "The Culling" by Steven Dos Santos, I started to realize page by page that this was very similar to "The Hunger Games" by Suzanne Collins but with a twist. The pages I read showed many human emotion in the sense that many emotions where being felt in just those 97 pages. I did sense a lot of desperation and also a lot of post apocalyptic elements into the story. I also realized that there is a sense of status in this book; a hierarchy. Similar to "The Hunger Games" there are the rich, who did not have to fight to the deaths to stay alive, and there are the poor who do have to fight. I am super excited to read the rest and see what happens to Digory and Lucky.
I think "Reason" by Isaac Asimov shows a very clear example as to why robots are dangerous, hahaha. But on a serious note, the theme in this story has been used throughout time in the movie scene. There have been many movies of robots being built by their "master" then going haywire after sometime realizing they should no longer obey human command and do what they want to do.I think Asimov gave the robot feelings on purpose. He could have just made a sci-fi story about robots and humans in space and not have the robot do what it does in the story. It gives the robots a human element and makes it a tad relatable to people who stray from their path or people who cause rebellion.
"Super-Toys last All Summer Long" by Brian Aldriss is very interesting for its time. Written in 1969 about a boy who starts to question whether he is real or not in this day and age of synthetic life form. It was sad for me in someway knowing (or assuming) that the mother of this boy may not even love him because he is not "real". I got to that conclusion (I may be wrong) because of the lack and difficulty of communication between mother and son. She is not a cruel mother but she tends to find it hard to love David and David tends to find hard what to express to her, which is very frustrating for both in the end.
I think "Reason" by Isaac Asimov shows a very clear example as to why robots are dangerous, hahaha. But on a serious note, the theme in this story has been used throughout time in the movie scene. There have been many movies of robots being built by their "master" then going haywire after sometime realizing they should no longer obey human command and do what they want to do.I think Asimov gave the robot feelings on purpose. He could have just made a sci-fi story about robots and humans in space and not have the robot do what it does in the story. It gives the robots a human element and makes it a tad relatable to people who stray from their path or people who cause rebellion.
"Super-Toys last All Summer Long" by Brian Aldriss is very interesting for its time. Written in 1969 about a boy who starts to question whether he is real or not in this day and age of synthetic life form. It was sad for me in someway knowing (or assuming) that the mother of this boy may not even love him because he is not "real". I got to that conclusion (I may be wrong) because of the lack and difficulty of communication between mother and son. She is not a cruel mother but she tends to find it hard to love David and David tends to find hard what to express to her, which is very frustrating for both in the end.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)